A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting manufactured by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where by sights of the sea are the two highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, according to sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, a picture that has since develop into emblematic in the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to gather visual proof of your wall’s position relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Periods reported, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the water all through significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm drinking water to photograph the website turned one of the most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these steps were cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into an area affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up protected in detail via the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt development pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial moment from the authorized timeline.
In the core of the dispute is often a disagreement over boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep which the wall, as created, goes beyond what was permitted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, continues to be described as meticulous in his examination of organizing documents, maps, and problems connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their action is inspired by problem for environmental defense and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got explained their very long-standing link to the region and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair only seeking to produce a loved ones home in accordance Along with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Unique Space of Conservation and say that all will work have already been performed according to Qualified suggestions and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with getting into The ocean through a storm, don't change the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also raised broader questions about how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for just a predicament that lots of observers see as progressively typical. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation amongst private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has become far more contentious.
The Irish Situations post about René Collier mentioned that the businessman experienced previously been linked to regional advocacy on arranging and environmental troubles, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from really diverse Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these kinds of Irish Times article about René Collier disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waist-large h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another extended after the lawful charges have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.